Greg's Corner

Tagged: bank scam Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  Geebo 8:00 am on August 25, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, customer service ( 57 ), impersonation scam ( 187 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  Scammers Hijack Printer, Steal $17K 

  

  By Greg Collier

  Authorities in Orange County, North Carolina, say a woman recently lost more than $17,000 in what investigators describe as part of a wide-reaching scam that has defrauded victims in the state.

  This case began when the victim attempted to log in to her bank account and was met with technical issues. Believing she had reached her bank, she called a number saved in her phone and was connected to individuals posing as financial representatives. She was told her accounts were frozen due to a suspicious charge and was transferred multiple times, eventually being instructed to download programs to her computer. The scammers manipulated her accounts to make it appear as though a large sum had been incorrectly deposited, then pressured her to withdraw cash to resolve the situation.

  The deception escalated when fraudulent letters, complete with a recognizable bank logo, began printing directly from her home printer. The letters warned her not to discuss the matter with her local branch, claiming there were tax complications tied to an online payment service. Under continued pressure during a phone call that lasted hours, she withdrew $17,500 from her account.

  At the bank, an employee asked her directly if she was being pressured into the withdrawal. She denied it, unaware she was being scammed, and signed a document stating she was taking the money out voluntarily. That step, while part of the bank’s effort to ensure customer protection, could also complicate any attempt she makes to recover her losses. By signing a waiver, she effectively confirmed to the bank that the withdrawal was her own decision, creating a potential defense for the institution should she pursue a reimbursement claim.

  She later handed the money directly to a man who arrived at her home, believing she was returning funds to resolve the supposed error. Investigators later confirmed that the individual who collected the money is facing multiple charges, including obtaining property under false pretenses and felony conspiracy.

  The financial consequences for the victim were severe, as the stolen funds came in part from an insurance policy she intended to use for medical expenses. Investigators have advised her that recovery of the money is unlikely given the speed with which the funds were moved.

  A representative from Bank of America stated that the bank is investigating the matter but could not provide further comment until the internal review is complete.

  Under U.S. banking regulations, customers are typically protected if their funds are taken through unauthorized electronic access. However, when a victim is manipulated into moving money themselves, banks often classify it as an authorized transaction. That distinction can leave victims without recourse, particularly when they have signed documents affirming the withdrawal was voluntary, even if they were under the influence of a scam at the time.

   

  Leave a ReplyCancel reply
• 

  Geebo 8:00 am on June 26, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank fraud ( 29 ), bank scam, Chase ( 16 ), cryptocurrency ( 57 ), pig butchering scam ( 19 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  When the Bank Is the Weak Link in Scams 

  

  By Greg Collier

  A recent investigation by ProPublica has once again laid bare the critical role banks play in enabling international fraud networks, often by doing very little. The report follows the case of a small family-run business in Boston that found itself entangled in a lawsuit over a crypto-related scam, despite having no connection to cryptocurrency or even an account at the bank involved. The bank in question, it turns out, had allowed a fraudster to open an account in the business’s name without identification, which was later used to move hundreds of thousands of dollars from scam victims.

  The scam in question is part of a growing phenomenon known as “pig butchering,” a long con in which victims are emotionally manipulated over time to invest increasing sums of money into fraudulent schemes. The funds are typically wired to domestic bank accounts that appear legitimate, then quickly moved and converted to cryptocurrency for laundering across borders. Many of these scams originate from Southeast Asian compounds operated by criminal syndicates with billions of dollars in annual proceeds.

  Banks are at the center of this laundering infrastructure. They are supposed to serve as gatekeepers, preventing the creation of fraudulent accounts and flagging suspicious activity. But as ProPublica outlines, the reality is often far more permissive. Criminal groups exploit lax verification protocols and the lack of mandatory fraud detection standards. In the case involving the Boston truck repair business, a Chase account was reportedly opened online using only a business identification number, with no personal ID or in-person verification.

  Scammers are well aware of these vulnerabilities and operate entire marketplaces to exploit them. Messaging apps like Telegram have hosted channels where money laundering facilitators openly advertise U.S. bank accounts for rent. These accounts are used to collect stolen funds, convert them to crypto, and forward them to overseas actors. Despite existing regulations requiring banks to monitor for suspicious behavior, enforcement is inconsistent. The law mandates that banks design anti-money laundering programs, but it does not require those programs to be effective.

  This regulatory gap creates a situation where the burden of vigilance often falls on the victim. In the ProPublica report, one scam victim lost nearly $400,000 by wiring money to accounts tied to shell companies at major financial institutions. Even after realizing he had been defrauded, his efforts to reverse the wires were largely unsuccessful. It took a lawsuit and media inquiry for one bank to finally return his money. That money had been sitting in a frozen account for months.

  We’ve been documenting bank scam stories for years where victims not only lose their savings but are met with indifference or hostility from the very institutions that facilitated the fraud. Often, banks treat scam victims as liabilities or even suspects, rather than customers in need of assistance.

  Some countries are taking stronger action. The United Kingdom now mandates that banks reimburse victims of authorized payment scams. Australia is moving toward greater information sharing among banks. Thailand has created a centralized fraud register to shut down suspicious accounts more efficiently. In contrast, the United States continues to rely on voluntary guidelines and industry self-regulation, even as fraud rates rise.

  ProPublica’s report highlights just how systemic this problem has become. It’s not just about one fraud or one bank, but a banking system that routinely fails to keep bad actors out. As long as institutions can look the other way without consequences, these scams will continue to thrive.

  We can only hope that this in-depth reporting begins to move the needle. Victims deserve more than platitudes and procedural roadblocks. Banks must be held to a higher standard before more lives and livelihoods are destroyed.

   
• 

  Geebo 8:00 am on April 3, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, moving money ( 9 ), Scams ( 1,558 ), Zelle ( 71 )   

  Zelle App Shuts Down, Scams Persist 

  

  By Greg Collier

  One of the most widely used names in digital banking has officially ended a major chapter of its service. As of this week, Zelle’s stand-alone app no longer allows users to send or receive payments, pushing millions of customers to rely exclusively on their banks’ apps to access the platform.

  Zelle had warned last year that its app would be decommissioned for payments on October 31, 2024. That plan quietly went into effect on Tuesday, with little disruption to most users. The standalone app, used by only a small fraction of Zelle’s total customer base, now serves a different purpose. It remains accessible, but it has shifted focus to consumer education, offering resources on how to avoid scams and directing users to the more than 2,200 banks and credit unions that support Zelle.

  Although the platform has 150 million users in the United States, only around two percent of its transactions occurred through the app itself. The overwhelming majority of payments are made directly through bank apps. That reality led Zelle’s parent company to shutter the underused platform and reinforce its role as a bank-integrated service.

  Since launching in 2017 with backing from major financial institutions including Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, Zelle has become the default peer-to-peer payment system for millions of Americans. Last year alone, it processed over $1 trillion in payments, far outpacing rivals like Venmo and Cash App. Unlike those competitors, Zelle does not hold transferred money in a separate wallet. Instead, it moves funds directly between bank accounts without charging users additional fees for instant transfers.

  While Zelle’s standalone app may be gone, that does not mean scams involving the service are going away. Fraudsters have long exploited the convenience and speed of peer-to-peer platforms, and Zelle is no exception. Consumers should remain cautious of unsolicited requests or calls urging them to move money, even if those instructions involve using their legitimate bank app. The closure of Zelle’s own app might shift how the platform is used, but it has not made scammers disappear.

  Bank officials and cybersecurity experts continue to warn that digital payment platforms are a favored tool for criminals posing as trusted sources. Just because Zelle now operates entirely through banking apps does not mean users are immune from manipulation. As Zelle pivots its public-facing platform toward fraud education, its success may depend as much on consumer awareness as on the technology itself.

   
• 

  Geebo 8:00 am on March 24, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, impersonation scam ( 187 ), phantom hacker scam ( 6 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  Scammed and Drained in a Single Day 

  

  By Greg Collier

  It started with a simple text. A “fraud alert” popped up on a phone, seemingly from a well-known bank, asking if a purchase had been made. With a quick reply of ‘No’, a chain of events unfolded that would upend a family’s sense of safety and drain their entire savings.

  What followed was a carefully staged performance. A caller claimed to represent her longtime bank and spoke with unsettling familiarity, addressing her by name, reciting her address, even referencing account details. According to him, fraudsters were attempting to wire tens of thousands of dollars out of her accounts. The message was urgent, serious, and disturbingly convincing.

  Under the guise of protection, he urged immediate action. Her money, he insisted, needed to be moved to a ‘safe’ account. One he would establish at another bank. A new debit card was remotely added to her digital wallet, making the ruse feel even more legitimate. When a snowstorm delayed her response, the next morning brought more pressure, heightened threats, added urgency, and fresh instructions.

  She was warned not to trust her own bank, and was told her accounts had been frozen. Access to her online login was supposedly locked. She was instructed to keep the call going while entering the bank and even while standing at the ATM. Every step was scripted, from what to say if questioned, to what must be kept hidden.

  Over the course of the day, she withdrew $44,000 in cash from two bank branches. She followed instructions to the letter, depositing the full amount into a new ATM account that she believed would protect her savings. The reality, however, was far more devastating, her money was gone, funneled into the hands of a stranger who had earned her trust through deception and fear.

  What makes this story even more painful is how deeply targeted it was. The caller didn’t just affect her finances. Two linked accounts belonging to her daughter were also wiped out, including the daughter’s entire savings. The emotional toll hit just as hard as the financial loss.

  After the scam became clear, so did the broader consequences. Shaken, anxious, and overwhelmed, she no longer feels safe doing basic tasks online. She questions everything and everyone. And when a data breach notification arrived just a day later, tied to a massive cyberattack on a major healthcare company, it only deepened the sense that this might not be over. Her information may have been stolen, sold, passed from one criminal hand to the next.

  What makes scams like this so dangerous is how much they’ve evolved. Gone are the days of clumsy, misspelled emails. Today’s scammers use real names, familiar logos, and cloned phone numbers. They build credibility before dismantling it. They construct elaborate narratives, carefully crafted to isolate and confuse. And they prey heavily on older adults, individuals more likely to pick up a call, more likely to trust a voice claiming to be from a bank, and more likely to feel a sense of obligation to act quickly in the face of danger.

  This story, painful as it is, is being shared with a purpose. To warn others. To protect others. To remind people that any unexpected communication involving urgent requests for money, especially from someone claiming to be from a trusted institution, deserves extra scrutiny. Always verify these claims independently. Never give in to pressure, and if something feels off, take a moment to stop and check with a friend, a family member, or directly with your bank using a trusted number.

  The truth is, anyone can be targeted. Scammers are skilled manipulators, and no one should feel ashamed for being caught in a moment of fear or confusion. What matters now is spreading awareness, strengthening protections, and supporting those who come forward, not just with empathy, but with action.

  If this happened to you or someone you love, would you know what to do? Now is the time to talk about it with your parents, with your neighbors, with your community. A single conversation could save someone’s life savings. And that’s something none of us can afford to ignore.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on January 21, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, BEC scam ( 7 ), business email compromise ( 14 ), direct deposit, paycheck scam ( 2 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  New Jersey Employers Hit by Deposit Scam 

  

  By Greg Collier

  A concerning scam targeting employers has recently surfaced in New Jersey, with several companies falling victim to fraudulent direct deposit change requests. While this scheme has been reported in Middlesex County, its nature suggests it could happen anywhere, making it a warning for businesses and employees nationwide.

  The scam operates through deceptive emails sent to employers, requesting changes to an employee’s direct deposit account. These emails often appear authentic, containing accurate details like the employee’s name, address, and social security number. This level of detail makes the requests seem legitimate, but a closer look at the sender’s email often reveals fraudulent origins.

  Once the employer processes the request, payroll funds are deposited into a new account controlled by the scammers, who withdraw the money almost immediately. In these cases, urgency was a recurring theme, with the fraudulent emails pressuring employers to act quickly without additional verification.

  This scam highlights a universal vulnerability in payroll systems. Employers everywhere should consider implementing stronger safeguards to verify any direct deposit change requests. Best practices include requiring in-person confirmation or using a verified phone number to authenticate the request. A dual-verification system can serve as a critical defense against unauthorized account changes.

  Employees also have a role in protecting their financial security. Regularly monitoring payroll deposits and immediately reporting discrepancies to employers and law enforcement can help limit the impact of fraudulent activity.

  This situation highlights the importance of secure communication in protecting sensitive payroll information. While the scam has been identified in New Jersey, its potential to occur elsewhere serves as a warning to businesses and workers everywhere to remain alert and proactive.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on January 17, 2025 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, customer service ( 57 ), impersonation scam ( 187 ), phantom hacker scam ( 6 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  Phantom Hacker Scam: Protect Your Money 

  

  By Greg Collier

  A distressing financial scam, known as ‘the phantom hacker’, is devastating lives and leaving consumers in financial ruin. The scheme, which has been gaining traction, involves scammers impersonating bank representatives and convincing victims to move their money to supposedly secure accounts. In reality, these accounts are controlled by the scammers, resulting in the loss of substantial sums.

  One heartbreaking story involves a hair stylist and mother of two who lost $20,000, money she had painstakingly saved to open her own business. It all began with a seemingly legitimate phone call claiming to be from her bank. The scammer, using sophisticated tactics, not only mimicked the bank’s official phone number but also created a sense of urgency, warning her of a supposed hacking attempt on her account. The victim was instructed to transfer her funds to a different account for protection. A move that ultimately handed her hard-earned savings directly to the scammer.

  This deceptive practice, as with most scams, preys on fear and trust. Victims are often too rattled by the immediate threat of losing their money to critically assess the situation. By the time doubts arise, the damage is already done. Financial institutions emphasize that they will never request clients to move funds in this manner, nor will they demand immediate action through wire transfers or other unusual methods.

  The FBI has highlighted the growing sophistication of such scams. Scammers can now spoof caller ID to make it appear as though they are calling from legitimate financial institutions. This adds a layer of credibility that makes it difficult for victims to recognize the deception. The agency urges the public to remain skeptical, especially when receiving unsolicited calls regarding financial matters.

  For the victims, the aftermath of such scams is devastating. Losing significant amounts of money not only disrupts financial stability but also derails life plans and dreams. Often, the funds are nearly impossible to recover, as scammers are adept at quickly moving the stolen money beyond reach.

  The emotional and psychological tolls are equally profound. Victims often grapple with feelings of shame and disbelief, wondering how they fell for the scheme. Yet, the FBI stresses the importance of reporting such incidents, no matter how embarrassing it may feel. Reporting helps authorities track these scams and work towards holding the perpetrators accountable.

  As these scams continue to evolve, public awareness remains the best defense. Verifying any suspicious communication directly with financial institutions and hesitating to act on high-pressure demands can prevent potential losses. For those impacted, reporting incidents through official channels such as the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center is a critical step in combating this growing threat.

  The phantom hacker scam serves as a grim reminder of the importance of safeguarding personal finances. As criminals become increasingly sophisticated, staying informed and cautious is essential to protecting what matters most.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on December 17, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank fraud ( 29 ), bank scam, impersonation scam ( 187 ), Scams ( 1,558 ), Zelle ( 71 )   

  New Zelle Protections Haven’t Changed Anything 

  

  By Greg Collier

  For years, consumers have been targeted by a common and deceptive scheme: scammers posing as bank representatives convincing victims to use Zelle to ‘protect’ or recover their money. Despite growing awareness of this tactic, the outcome for victims has often been devastating, leaving them with little recourse and significant financial loss.

  Zelle and the banks behind it have long faced criticism for not doing enough to protect consumers. In response to mounting pressure, Zelle announced a new policy in late 2023 that banks would be required to reimburse customers for certain types of scams. The wording of this policy included an important caveat. Banks would refund consumers for “qualifying imposter scams”.

  The intent of the new policy was to create stronger protections for victims of fraud. However, recent cases suggest these so-called new guidelines are not much different from the old ones. Banks continue to deny reimbursements based on the familiar rationale that customers ‘authorized’ the transactions. This remains the linchpin argument banks use to place responsibility on consumers, even when the authorization occurred under false pretenses orchestrated by scammers.

  A recent incident illustrates how easily someone can fall victim to this type of fraud. A couple was contacted by someone claiming to be from Wells Fargo’s fraud department. The phone number even appeared to belong to the bank, thanks to modern spoofing technology. The caller asked about supposed fraudulent activity, reassured the couple that their funds would be safe, and then walked them through a series of Zelle transactions. Only later did they realize it was all a scam, and they had lost thousands of dollars.

  Despite reporting the incident to their bank, their request for reimbursement was denied. The bank cited the fact that the transactions were ‘authorized’. This reasoning aligns with the longstanding defense that if customers themselves approve the transfer, even under pressure or misinformation, the responsibility remains with them.

  Zelle’s official stance highlights a crucial ambiguity in their policy. The company has stated that not all scams involving imposters qualify for reimbursement, but they refuse to share the criteria for ‘qualifying’ cases. According to Zelle, disclosing this information would give criminals a playbook for avoiding detection. This lack of transparency leaves consumers frustrated and uncertain about whether they can expect any protection at all.

  The central issue remains that scammers have become increasingly adept at manipulating technology to exploit consumer trust. Policies promising reimbursement offer a glimmer of hope, but the reality for many victims has not improved. While Zelle and participating banks claim they are addressing the problem, their actions suggest otherwise. Until clearer and stronger protections are implemented, consumers must remain vigilant and cautious with unsolicited calls and Zelle transactions.

  For now, the lesson remains the same: don’t trust caller ID, don’t act under pressure, and always verify directly with your bank.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on December 5, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank fraud ( 29 ), bank scam, chip cards, couriers ( 5 ), debit cards ( 16 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  Latest Bank Scam Targets Card Chips 

  

  By Greg Collier

  Chip-enabled debit cards are designed to provide an extra layer of security for consumers, but scammers are now exploiting this technology in a startling new scheme that could drain your bank account. If you’re not careful, you could fall victim to this sophisticated fraud that combines phishing, spoofing, and clever social engineering.

  Here’s how the scam unfolds. It begins with an email or text message that appears to be from your bank, alerting you to an issue with your debit card. This message is quickly followed by a phone call, supposedly from your bank’s customer service team. Thanks to spoofing technology, the call looks legitimate, displaying the actual phone number of your bank.

  The caller claims there’s a problem with your card and instructs you to cut the card in half for security reasons, but keep the chip intact. They then explain that a bank representative or courier will come to your home to collect the chip for further investigation or replacement. When the ‘courier’ arrives, they use subtle but effective social engineering tactics to convince you to share your PIN. Once they have both the chip and your PIN, the scammers can easily install the chip into a new card and access your funds.

  This scam is particularly alarming because it leverages trust in your bank and creates a false sense of urgency. However, it’s critical to remember one key fact, no legitimate bank will ever send a courier to your home to address issues with your account. Any such request should be an immediate red flag.

  This isn’t the only scam involving so-called ‘couriers’. Fraudsters often use individuals posing as couriers to execute other schemes, such as fake lottery winnings or fraudulent purchases. In some cases, they may even recruit unwitting ride-share drivers to pick up and deliver items, adding another layer of confusion and detachment from the actual crime.

  To protect yourself, never share your PIN or other sensitive information with anyone, even if they appear to be from your bank. If you receive a suspicious call or message, hang up and contact your bank directly using the number on the back of your card. Additionally, never hand over your card chip or any other personal banking materials to someone claiming to be a representative of your bank.

  By recognizing the warning signs and refusing to engage with fraudulent requests, you can safeguard your finances and avoid becoming a victim of this alarming new scheme.

   
• 

  Geebo 8:00 am on September 13, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, bitcoin atm ( 30 ), elderly ( 12 ), impersonation scam ( 187 ), robbery ( 12 ), Scams ( 1,558 )   

  Elderly Victim Robbed During Scam 

  

  By Greg Collier

  A recent incident in Houston, Texas, highlights the growing threat of scams targeting the elderly, leaving victims vulnerable to devastating financial losses. In July, an 80-year-old woman fell prey to a sophisticated scheme that ended with her losing $76,000.

  The scam began with a phone call from an individual posing as a bank employee, warning the woman that her bank had been hacked. This person instructed the victim to transfer her funds to a cryptocurrency kiosk for safekeeping. To further the scam, the victim was convinced to download an app that allowed the scammer to take control of her phone remotely.

  Following these instructions, the victim went to a convenience store to deposit $19,000 into a cryptocurrency kiosk. Sadly, while at the location, she was robbed of the cash by two unidentified males who grabbed the envelope and ran off. It remains unclear whether they were directly connected to the scam or simply taking advantage of the situation.

  What makes this case particularly alarming is that, even after the robbery, the scammer contacted the victim again. Despite having just lost a significant amount of money, the victim was manipulated into returning to the same location to deposit another $19,000. Over the course of four days, the elderly woman withdrew a total of $76,000 under the scammer’s instructions.

  In addition to the direct theft, the scammer provided coaching on what to tell bank employees when questioned about the large withdrawals. The victim was advised to claim the money was needed for home repairs, with the implication that even the bank staff couldn’t be trusted.

  There were several key warning signs in this scam that others should be mindful of to avoid falling victim. The scam began with an unsolicited phone call from someone posing as a bank employee, which is a common tactic used to catch victims off guard. Legitimate financial institutions typically don’t initiate calls out of the blue regarding account issues, making this the first red flag. The scammer then created a sense of urgency, pressuring the victim to transfer her money into a cryptocurrency kiosk under the guise of protecting her funds. It’s important to remember that banks or financial institutions will never ask customers to make transfers like this to safeguard their accounts.

  Another critical sign of deception was the request for the victim to download a remote access app, which allowed the scammer full control of her phone. No credible business or bank would ever ask for such invasive access to a personal device. Additionally, the scammer coached the victim to lie to bank employees if questioned about the withdrawals, further isolating her and fostering distrust in those who could have helped. When someone advises lying to a financial institution, it’s a clear indication of foul play.

  The repeated demands for large cash withdrawals over a short period should have also raised concern. Such behavior is unusual and suspicious, particularly when accompanied by the insistence that even bank employees couldn’t be trusted. This sowing of mistrust is a classic scam tactic, used to manipulate victims into relying solely on the scammer’s instructions.

  Recognizing these signs, unexpected calls, urgent financial requests, remote access demands, secrecy, and isolation, can help prevent falling prey to similar schemes. Always take the time to verify claims through trusted channels before taking any action.

   
• 

  Geebo 8:01 am on August 15, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: bank scam, job scam ( 89 ), Scams ( 1,558 ), Zelle ( 71 )   

  Zelle wouldn’t help until the media got involved 

  

  By Greg Collier

  When digital payments are becoming the norm, it’s easy to assume that services like Zelle offer the same protections as credit cards. But one Tucson resident learned the hard way that this isn’t always the case.

  It all started with a text message from a recruiter claiming to represent a prominent international technology company. The offer seemed legitimate, with a formal interview conducted via text. But there was a catch. The jobseeker was asked to send $950 for remote work equipment. Trusting the process, he transferred the money through Zelle, expecting to start his new job soon after.

  However, as the days passed, it became clear that the job wasn’t real. He had fallen victim to a scam, losing nearly a thousand dollars in the process.

  Realizing he had been scammed, the man contacted his bank, hoping they could help him reverse the transaction. To his dismay, the bank declined his request. Their reasoning? The payment had been authorized, meaning it was processed exactly as he intended. Because he had willingly sent the money through Zelle, they claimed there was nothing they could do.

  Feeling frustrated and out of options, the man decided to reach out to a local news station. He shared his story, hoping that public attention might help his case. The news team took up the challenge and contacted the bank on his behalf, pushing for a resolution.

  The involvement of the media made a difference. After further review, the bank reconsidered its position. They reversed the transaction and credited the man’s account with the full $950 he had lost.

  To protect yourself, always be wary of any situation that involves sending money to someone you don’t personally know. If something feels off, trust your instincts. And if you find yourself in a similar situation, remember that persistence, and sometimes public attention, can be key to resolving the issue.

  This story underscores a troubling reality. It shouldn’t take the involvement of the media or public pressure to get Zelle or a bank to take action in cases of fraud. Digital payment services should prioritize protecting their users and have mechanisms in place to address scams swiftly and fairly. While this Tucson man was fortunate to recover his funds, it’s a reminder that more robust consumer protections are needed to ensure that others don’t have to fight so hard to reclaim what was wrongfully taken from them.