Tagged: FTC Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on October 23, 2026 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: FTC, , , ,   

    Scammers Threaten to Disconnect Your Phone 

    Scammers Threaten to Disconnect Your Phone

    By Greg Collier

    Imagine getting a phone call from someone claiming to work for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They tell you that a phone number registered in your name is being used to commit scams overseas. They read you an official-sounding badge number, warn that your own phone number could be deactivated, and transfer you to someone claiming to be a police officer.

    Before long, you’re being told that you’re under investigation, that you could face arrest, and that you need to send money to avoid trouble.

    Sounds terrifying. That’s precisely the point.

    According to a consumer alert published by the Federal Trade Commission yesterday, scammers are impersonating FTC officials and threatening to deactivate people’s phone numbers as part of an elaborate scheme to steal money and personal information.

    The threats are fake. The badge numbers are fake. And the supposed police officers are part of the scam.

    First, They Threaten Your Phone Number

    The scam begins with an unexpected call from someone claiming to be an FTC official. The caller alleges that a phone has been registered under your name and number and is being used to commit scams in another country.

    The caller may even provide a badge identification number to make the story sound legitimate. But an official-sounding number is easy to invent, and it doesn’t prove that the person calling actually works for the government.

    Then comes the threat: If you don’t cooperate, your phone number will be deactivated.

    For most people, losing their phone number would be a serious problem. Phones are used for work, banking, two-factor authentication, family emergencies, and countless everyday activities. The threat is designed to make you panic and follow instructions before you have time to question the caller.

    That’s how these scams work. The criminal invents a frightening problem, claims to have the authority to fix it, and uses the threat of consequences to pressure you into doing what they want.

    But the FTC is not calling people to threaten their phone service. If someone claiming to represent the agency says otherwise, you’re dealing with a scammer.

    The Fake Police Officer Makes It Seem Real

    If the initial call doesn’t convince you, the scammers have another trick ready.

    According to the FTC, the supposed agency official may transfer you to a person claiming to be a police officer who will help you file a report. In some cases, the scammer may even encourage you to hang up and call a police department directly.

    That might sound like a sensible way to verify the story. Unfortunately, the scammers have planned for it.

    They tell you what to search for online to find the department’s phone number. When you call, someone involved in the scam answers.

    This is an especially deceptive tactic because it appears to give you independent confirmation. You aren’t simply accepting the original caller’s word. You’re making another call and speaking to someone who claims to be with law enforcement.

    But if the scammers control both sides of the conversation, you’ve verified nothing.

    The important lesson is that a second phone call is not necessarily independent verification. If a suspicious caller tells you which number to dial, where to find it, or whom to ask for, don’t assume the process is safe simply because you made the call yourself.

    Instead, find the agency’s contact information independently through a trusted official website or another reliable source.

    Next, They Want Your Identity

    Once the scammers have convinced you that the situation is real, they may ask for your identification and other personal information to prepare their supposed police report.

    They may also tell you to keep the conversations secret.

    That secrecy is another major warning sign. It isolates you from people who might recognize the scam and talk you out of sending money. It also gives the criminals more control over the situation.

    Your identification and personal information could potentially be used for identity theft or to make subsequent scams more convincing. Information you provide during the first call may help scammers impersonate officials, answer questions about your supposed case, or pressure you more effectively later.

    Never assume that someone is entitled to your personal information simply because they claim to be preparing a report. Verify who you’re dealing with before sharing anything sensitive.

    And if a supposed government official tells you not to discuss the situation with anyone, take that as a reason to stop and check the story, not as a reason to keep quiet.

    The Final Demand: Pay to Avoid Arrest

    The scam may escalate after the initial calls. The criminals return with even more alarming news: they claim you’re under arrest because your phone number was associated with criminal activity. They may tell you that you have to travel to another country and demand a security deposit to avoid the supposed consequences.

    This is where the scam’s threats turn into a direct attempt to steal your money.

    The story is designed to make you feel trapped. You have supposedly been linked to crimes overseas, your phone number is at risk, and law enforcement is supposedly involved. The scammers want you to believe that sending money is the only way out.

    But none of it is true.

    The FTC warns that a real FTC employee will never contact you to demand that you send money or connect you with someone who tells you to pay. FTC employees will not threaten to disconnect your phone number, and they will not tell you to keep these conversations secret. The agency also will not text you a photo of an employee ID as a way to verify its authenticity.

    A badge number, a convincing voice, a photo of an ID, or a person claiming to be a police officer does not make the story legitimate.

    There is no security deposit you need to pay to make this supposed case go away. The demand for money is the scam.

    How to Protect Yourself

    If someone calls claiming to be from the FTC and threatens to deactivate your phone number, hang up. Don’t provide personal information, send money, or follow instructions from the caller.

    Do not trust a phone number just because it appears on your caller ID. Scammers can manipulate caller ID information to make a call look as though it comes from a legitimate organization.

    If you want to check whether a government agency has actually contacted you, use contact information you find independently on the agency’s official website. Don’t rely on a number provided by the caller or on a search process the caller directs you to follow.

    Never send money to someone who claims you need to pay a security deposit, fine, or fee to avoid arrest over the phone. Be especially wary of demands for cryptocurrency, gift cards, wire transfers, or payments through apps.

    And don’t let a secrecy demand keep you from asking for help. Talk to someone you trust, particularly if the caller is trying to frighten you into making an immediate decision.

    If you’ve already shared personal information or sent money, contact your financial institution promptly if applicable, preserve messages and payment records, and report the incident at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.

    The FTC Doesn’t Need Your Money to Protect You

    Government impersonation scams succeed because they exploit the trust people place in official institutions. Add a threat involving your phone service, a fabricated criminal investigation, and the possibility of arrest, and the pressure can become overwhelming.

    But remember what the scammers are counting on: fear, urgency, and your willingness to believe that the person on the phone has authority over your life.

    The FTC is not calling to deactivate your phone number. It isn’t going to demand a payment to protect you from arrest, and it won’t instruct you to keep a supposed investigation secret.

    If someone claims otherwise, don’t try to negotiate with them or prove your innocence. Hang up.

    Your phone number is not about to be shut off because you refused to pay a stranger. The only thing you may lose by ending that call is the opportunity for a scammer to take your money.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on August 19, 2025 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Apple Cash, , FTC, , , , transfer it to protect it   

    Scammers Push “Transfer It to Protect It” Cons 

    Scammers Push “Transfer It to Protect It” Cons

    By Greg Collier

    A troubling trend in financial fraud has been steadily growing in recent years. Known as “transfer it to protect it” scams, or more commonly as the “moving money scam,” these schemes involve criminals posing as trusted entities to convince people that their money is at risk and must be moved immediately for safekeeping. The Federal Trade Commission reports that losses tied to this scam have risen dramatically, particularly among older adults.

    Data from the FTC shows a more than a fourfold increase between 2020 and 2024 in reports from people who lost $10,000 or more after being targeted by impersonators of banks, businesses, or government agencies. Older adults are disproportionately affected, with many victims losing well over $100,000. Combined losses among those reporting six-figure losses reached $445 million in 2024, compared with $55 million in 2020.

    The methods are varied but share the same goal. Some victims receive alarming phone calls warning that their accounts have been compromised. Others encounter fake pop-up alerts on their computers or emails from senders claiming to represent their bank. Once the victim is unsettled, the fraudster pushes them to move money quickly. Common instructions involve sending funds through Bitcoin ATMs, wiring money to a so-called secure account, or even transferring money through services like Apple Cash. The FTC notes that government agencies and legitimate businesses do not request payment or money transfers in these ways.

    Younger consumers are not immune either. Reports include cases of individuals in their late teens and early twenties being manipulated into sending money through similar tactics. The scammers’ stories are always urgent and intimidating, designed to rush the victim into handing over control of their savings.

    The FTC’s latest data shows how victims are persuaded to move money: about one-third of older adults who reported losing $10,000 or more in 2024 said they transferred funds using cryptocurrency. Others reported using bank transfers or handing over cash. Once money is deposited into cryptocurrency ATMs or moved into fraudulent accounts, it is rarely recoverable.

    Another key factor in the success of the moving money scam is the psychology behind it. Scammers rely on fear and urgency to push victims into acting without thinking. They often keep people on the line for extended conversations to prevent them from double-checking information or reaching out for advice. In some cases, victims are even warned not to tell family or friends about what is happening, under the false pretense of protecting an investigation. This deliberate isolation makes the scam particularly dangerous, because it exploits both financial vulnerability and human trust.

    Officials warn that some scammers even go as far as impersonating the FTC itself or other federal agencies, adding credibility to their demands. These calls sometimes escalate to threats of frozen assets or arrest warrants, pressuring victims to comply.

    The best protection is skepticism toward unsolicited messages that urge immediate action with your finances. Instead of engaging, consumers are encouraged to verify account activity directly through their bank or credit card provider. Hanging up the phone and avoiding suspicious links are safer paths than reacting to the urgent claims of someone who may be impersonating a trusted source.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on June 27, 2025 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: FTC, , , , ,   

    Walmart Fined $10M Over Scam Transfers 

    Walmart Fined $10M Over Scam Transfers

    By Greg Collier

    When scammers aren’t asking for gift cards or precious metals, they’re often relying on money transfers. These services offer a fast, irreversible way to move cash, making them an attractive tool for fraud. One of the most accessible and widely used venues for money transfers in the United States is Walmart. Now, the retail giant has agreed to pay $10 million to settle charges brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over its handling of scam-related transfers.

    The FTC alleged that for years Walmart allowed its in-store money transfer services to be exploited by criminals. According to the agency, from 2013 to 2018, the company failed to enforce adequate anti-fraud policies and procedures. It also did not properly train staff or effectively warn customers about the risks associated with certain types of money transfers. These failures reportedly allowed scammers to take hundreds of millions of dollars from consumers, often in the context of impersonation schemes, bogus telemarketing offers, and fraudulent payments for nonexistent services or goods.

    Walmart acted as an agent for major transfer networks, including MoneyGram and Western Union, during the period in question. The FTC’s case pointed to a pattern of neglect that enabled widespread abuse. Though an amended complaint filed in 2023 expanded on these allegations, the Commission faced setbacks in court. A key telemarketing claim was dismissed twice, limiting the agency’s ability to seek broader consumer restitution. However, the resolution announced this month marks a partial victory, setting enforceable standards for future conduct.

    The final order, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, is designed to prevent similar problems going forward. Walmart is now prohibited from continuing money transfer operations without taking meaningful steps to detect and stop fraud. The company is also barred from facilitating or supporting telemarketers who use these transfers to extract upfront payments or who solicit money under deceptive pretenses.

    The $10 million settlement is relatively small compared to the scale of the alleged fraud, but it underscores the importance of corporate responsibility in the financial services sector. Consumers continue to be targeted through a range of schemes that depend on fast and irreversible payments. When retailers provide these services, they also carry the obligation to help safeguard the public.

    This case highlights how a lack of oversight at the point of service can lead to substantial harm. Whether through wire transfers, gift cards, or digital platforms, scammers thrive on speed and anonymity. Regulatory action like this serves as a reminder that vigilance and consumer protection must be a priority wherever money changes hands.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:00 am on December 13, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: app optimization, , FTC, , , , ,   

    FTC Warns of “Task Scams” 

    FTC Warns of "Task Scams"

    By Greg Collier

    The digital age has brought countless opportunities for remote work, but it has also opened the door to sophisticated scams that exploit jobseekers. According to new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) data, online job scams, especially those known as ‘task scams’, have seen a sharp rise, accompanied by devastating financial losses for victims.

    Task scams, a relatively new phenomenon, have surged dramatically in recent years. In 2020, there were no reported cases of these scams, but by 2023, reports had climbed to 5,000. In the first half of 2024 alone, reports skyrocketed to approximately 20,000. In just the first six months of 2024, reported losses to job scams exceeded $220 million, with task scams estimated to account for nearly 40% of those cases.

    The mechanics of task scams are alarmingly deceptive. They often begin with an unsolicited message via text or messaging apps, offering vague opportunities to earn money online. Respondents are typically introduced to tasks such as ‘app optimization’ or ‘product boosting’. To build trust, victims may receive small payouts for initial tasks, giving the impression of a legitimate arrangement. However, the scam escalates when victims are asked to invest their own money, typically in cryptocurrency, to complete additional tasks, with promises of higher returns. Once the money is sent, it is never recovered.

    The FTC’s data underscores the urgency of staying wary of these scams. Consumers are advised to be wary of unsolicited messages offering vague job opportunities. Legitimate employers rarely initiate contact through text or messaging apps, and no credible job will require payment to receive payment. Additionally, offers to rate or ‘like’ online content for compensation should be treated with skepticism, as they are often illegal and a hallmark of fraudulent schemes.

    As job scams evolve in scale and sophistication, raising awareness is critical. By understanding the tactics employed by scammers and recognizing the warning signs, individuals can better protect themselves from falling victim to these predatory schemes. While technology has revolutionized the job market, it also calls for heightened caution to navigate its risks safely.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:00 am on November 18, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , FTC, , ,   

    Fake Apple Email Led to a $430,000 Gold Bar Scam 

    Fake Apple Email Led to a $430,000 Gold Bar Scam

    By Greg Collier

    In the quiet town of Prescott, Wisconsin, a woman’s financial nightmare began with what appeared to be a legitimate email from Apple. The message warned her that her IP address had been compromised, prompting her to call a number provided. That call set off a chain of events that ultimately drained her retirement savings, costing her more than $430,000. The funds, which she converted into gold bars at the direction of scammers, vanished without a trace.

    Her story is one of nearly 50 reported cases in Wisconsin, where victims have collectively lost approximately $13 million to similar scams. These schemes are highly sophisticated, targeting older individuals with significant savings by exploiting their trust in well-known companies and government agencies.

    The email appeared harmless, a routine security alert from Apple. Trusting the brand, the woman dialed the number provided and was connected to someone claiming to be the head of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The imposter warned her that her identity had been stolen, and her bank accounts were at risk. To protect her funds, he advised her to liquidate her savings and purchase gold bars. These, he assured her, would be safeguarded by the Federal Reserve.

    The scammers maintained an air of urgency, keeping constant contact and coaching her to lie to bank tellers, claiming she was helping a family member with business investments. After purchasing the gold, couriers arrived at her home to collect it. They promised the gold was secure, but it was gone for good.

    In this instance, couriers were pivotal. Tasked with retrieving the gold bars, they traveled extensively, their movements spanning multiple states. Fortunately, some were apprehended during coordinated sting operations, but these arrests only touched the surface of a broader, more insidious network. Such schemes often originate overseas, beyond the reach of local law enforcement.

    For victims, justice offers little consolation. The Prescott woman has yet to recover a dime of her stolen savings, and the chances of restitution are slim. The emotional and financial toll persists, leaving her fearful of even basic financial activities.

    Scammers often impersonate trusted brands like Apple or even government officials to manipulate their victims. It’s crucial to remember that legitimate companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook will never tell you if your bank account has been compromised. They do not have access to that information. Likewise, the FTC and its officials will never demand immediate financial actions or direct you to purchase gold.

    If you receive a suspicious call or email, hang up or delete it immediately. Contact the company or organization directly using verified contact information from their official website. If someone claims to be from your bank, end the call and dial your bank’s official number to confirm the legitimacy of the request. Scammers rely on fear and urgency, but taking a moment to verify can protect you from becoming their next victim.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on August 29, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , FTC, , , unpaid tuition   

    Scam Calls Target Students Over Unpaid Tuition 

    Scam Calls Target Students Over Unpaid Tuition

    By Greg Collier

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a warning to college students and their parents about a growing scam that targets those paying tuition. Imagine receiving a call from someone claiming to be from your school’s financial aid office, telling you that your tuition bill hasn’t been paid. The caller might threaten to drop your classes unless you send money immediately. While this may cause alarm, it’s essential to pause and think carefully, you could be dealing with a scammer.

    These scammers pose as school officials, often claiming that financial aid has fallen through or that your transcripts are being held until the balance is paid. Their goal is to create a sense of urgency, pressuring you to act without verifying the legitimacy of the claim. However, a legitimate school office would never try to scare you into making a payment over the phone.

    If you receive such a call, it’s crucial not to panic. Scammers rely on the fear of missing out on classes or having academic records withheld to trick you into making hasty decisions. Instead of responding immediately, take the time to verify the situation through secure channels. Most schools post tuition bills on secure student portals, where you can safely check your balance and make payments. If you’re still uncertain, contact the financial aid or billing office directly using a phone number you know is legitimate.

    Remember, scammers can manipulate caller ID to make it appear as if the call is coming from your campus. Don’t trust what you see on the screen, and never give out your bank or credit card information over the phone to an unknown caller. If someone pressures you to pay with cryptocurrency, wire transfers, or gift cards, it’s almost certainly a scam.

    The FTC urges anyone who encounters this scam to report it. By spreading the word, you can help protect others from falling victim to these deceptive tactics. Always verify through trusted sources before making any payments, especially when it comes to something as important as education.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on May 14, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: FTC, , , , ,   

    FTC issues Social Security impersonation scam warning 

    By Greg Collier

    One of the most sensitive pieces of personal information is a Social Security number. If a malicious individual were to obtain someone’s Social Security number through illegal means, it could lead to financial devastation due to identity theft. While identity theft is a serious crime, it is important to note, as per the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), that no one can commit a crime using your Social Security number alone. This might sound perplexing, so let us clarify.

    The FTC recently issued a warning about impersonation scams. As the name suggests, these scams involve scammers pretending to be a government agency to extort money from their victims. In this case, scammers are impersonating the Social Security Administration (SSA).

    Scammers will call their victims, claiming to be from the SSA, while spoofing the SSA’s phone number on caller ID. They tell the victim that their Social Security number has been used in a crime, such as money laundering or drug trafficking, and that an arrest warrant has been issued for the Social Security cardholder.

    However, the scammers will pretend to want to help the victim. They advise the victims to protect their money from being seized by law enforcement by withdrawing it from the bank and converting it to gold. Then, an “agent” of the SSA will come by to collect the gold for safekeeping.

    In the FTC’s latest warning, they emphasize that this is nothing more than a scam. They clarify that no one can use your Social Security number to commit crimes in your name. They also stress that anyone who instructs you to buy gold, withdraw cash, and give it to someone is a scammer.

    If someone receives a call like this, the FTC advises them to hang up and report it on the FTC’s Report Fraud webpage. They also recommend that if someone is coming to your home to collect money or gold, you should contact your local police department.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on March 20, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , FTC, , ,   

    FTC refunds millions to student loan scam victims 

    FTC refunds millions to student loan scam victims

    By Greg Collier

    When student loans weigh heavily on many, news of relief is often met with both hope and skepticism. Unfortunately, for over 27,000 borrowers, hope turned into despair as they fell prey to a scam that promised relief but delivered only financial ruin. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced that it’s sending over $4.1 million in refunds to student loan borrowers who were deceived by scammers.

    The perpetrators of this deceitful scheme found themselves at the center of an FTC complaint filed in 2019. The scam was as cunning as it was heartless. They promised to lower monthly student loan payments and offered to take over loan servicing, all while siphoning off hundreds to thousands of dollars in illegal upfront fees from unsuspecting borrowers.

    Instead of easing the financial burden, these scammers exacerbated it. The FTC revealed that only a fraction of the payments made by borrowers was actually applied to their loans, if any at all. The rest was pocketed by the fraudulent operators, leaving borrowers not only out of pocket but deeper in debt.

    As anticipated, it’s sadly predictable that scammers will also target those receiving these refunds. Scammers are often quick to exploit the confusion and desperation of borrowers.

    The warning signs are clear. Unsolicited calls or emails pressuring borrowers to ‘act immediately,’ promises of being ‘flagged for forgiveness,’ or programs claiming to be ‘first come, first served’ should all raise red flags. In an era where information is abundant, but trust is scarce, borrowers must exercise caution and diligence.

    The Education Department’s website stands as a beacon of reliable guidance amidst the sea of misinformation. Detailed resources on federal student loan forgiveness programs offer borrowers a roadmap to navigating the complex terrain of student loan relief.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:00 am on February 16, 2024 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Charlotte Cowles, FTC, , ,   

    Financial advice columnist shares her story about falling for a scam 

    Financial advice columnist shares her story about falling for a scam

    By Greg Collier

    We firmly believe that no one is immune to falling for a scam. Regardless of someone’s socioeconomic status or level of education, they can still be targeted. Every individual is vulnerable to scams; there’s no exception.

    If there was to be an exception, it should be a renowned and successful financial advice columnist. But even someone in such a position can fall prey to a scam if placed under sufficient pressure from the scammer.

    It’s unfortunate but not uncommon for even those well-versed in finance to fall victim to scams. Take Charlotte Cowles, a financial advice columnist for The Cut, a division of New York Magazine, for example. Last Halloween, she received a call from someone posing as an Amazon customer service representative. They claimed she had made an $8000 purchase of Apple products, which she hadn’t. Ms. Cowles wisely checked her Amazon account, finding no such transactions. However, the scammer had a response ready, alleging that a business account was opened in her name. Despite her vigilance, Ms. Cowles was convinced her identity had been compromised.

    Continuing the conversation, the fake Amazon representative exploited the situation further, claiming that the company was facing widespread issues with identity theft among its customers. To add credibility, they mentioned having a liaison within the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Ms. Cowles, concerned about the apparent threat to her identity, agreed to be connected to the supposed FTC agent.

    The deceptive FTC impostor already possessed personal details about Ms. Cowles, including the last four digits of her Social Security number, her home address, and her date of birth. With such sensitive information in hand, it’s understandable why a victim might be inclined to trust the fraudulent claims being made. This level of sophistication can make the scam appear legitimate and increase the victim’s susceptibility to manipulation.

    In addition to the personal details already disclosed, the counterfeit FTC representative went on to fabricate a dire scenario, claiming that numerous bank accounts, vehicles, and properties were registered under Ms. Cowles’ name. Adding to the distressing narrative, they alleged that a car linked to her identity had been discovered near the Texas-Mexico border, rented in her name, and found containing illicit drugs. These false claims likely intensified Ms. Cowles’ sense of urgency and fear, further blurring the line between truth and deception.

    The deceitful tactics didn’t stop there. Ms. Cowles was informed by the scammer that arrest warrants had been issued against her in multiple states, accusing her of serious crimes such as drug trafficking and money laundering.

    To further isolate their victim and maintain control, the fraudulent FTC agent instructed Ms. Cowles not to disclose the situation to anyone, cautioning her that anyone she confided in could potentially be a suspect in the fabricated crimes.

    Despite the fraudulent claims and attempts to exploit her, Ms. Cowles was led to believe that the FTC was there to safeguard her finances. When asked how much money she would require to sustain herself for a year, she stated $50,000. Shockingly, the impostor instructed her to withdraw this amount in cash from her bank and assured her that it would be collected from her residence by a supposed CIA agent. Even during the withdrawal process, there were warnings. The bank teller, sensing something amiss, cautioned Ms. Cowles about potential scams associated with large cash withdrawals.

    Under the false pretext of protecting her identity, Ms. Cowles was instructed to hand over the withdrawn cash to the supposed CIA agent, who would then allegedly provide her with a new government check issued under a new Social Security number.

    As instructed, Ms. Cowles handed over the box containing the $50,000 to the driver of an SUV with tinted windows that pulled up to her residence.

    Ms. Cowles’s experience highlights the profound emotional toll inflicted by falling victim to scammers. In her account, she vividly expresses the overwhelming sense of shame that washed over her upon realizing she had been deceived. This aspect is crucial because it underscores the psychological impact that financial scams can have on individuals, often extending far beyond the immediate financial loss. The shame and self-blame experienced by victims like Ms. Cowles serve as a poignant reminder of the need for compassion and support for those who have been targeted by fraudsters.

    We urge you to take the time to read Ms. Cowles’s comprehensive narrative of the scam in her latest column.

    Ms. Cowles’s account serves as a powerful reminder that no one is immune to the threat of scams. Regardless of our education, background, or financial status, we are all susceptible to being deceived. By sharing her experience, she highlights the importance of remaining vigilant and informed in the face of evolving tactics employed by fraudsters. Let her story be a call to action for all of us to educate ourselves, support one another, and work together to combat the scourge of scams in our communities.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:00 am on November 27, 2023 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: FTC, , , , ,   

    The FTC puts a bounty on AI voice cloning 

    The FTC puts a bounty on AI voice cloning

    By Greg Collier

    AI-generated voice cloning, or voice spoofing, scams have become such a nuisance, the federal government is turning to the people to help solve the problem. If you’re unfamiliar with AI-voice generation technology, there are apps and programs that can take a short sample of anyone’s voice and make that voice say whatever you want it to. The benefit of it is it can give people who lost their speaking ability a voice. However, every tool that’s made for the good of mankind can also be used to its detriment.

    Scammers use cloned voices in what are known as emergency scams. Emergency scams can be broken down into two categories, for the most part, the grandparent scam, and the virtual kidnapping scam. In both sets of scams, the scammers need to convince their victim one of the victim’s loved ones is in some sort of peril. In the case of the grandparent scam, the scammer will try to convince the victim their loved one is in jail and needs bail money. While in the virtual kidnapping scam, the scammers try to convince the victim their loved one has been kidnapped for ransom.

    Scammers will take a sample of someone’s voice, typically from a video that’s been posted to social media. Then, they’ll use the voice cloning technology to make it sound like that person is in a situation that requires the victim to send money.

    Voice cloning has become such a problem, the Federal Trade Commission has issued a challenge to anyone who thinks they can develop some kind of voice cloning detector. The top prize winner can receive $25,000, the runner-up can get $4000, while three honorable mentions can get $2000.

    In their own words, the FTC has issued this challenge to help push forward ideas to mitigate risks upstream—shielding consumers, creative professionals, and small businesses against the harms of voice cloning before the harm reaches a consumer.

    The online submission portal can be found at this link, and submissions will be accepted from January 2 to 12, 2024.

    Hopefully, someone can come up with the right idea to better help consumers from losing their money to these scammers.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel