Greg's Corner

Tagged: data breach Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on October 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), hacking ( 31 )   

  Latest Facebook hack was not politically motivated. The real explanation is worse. 

  

  It was back in late September, which was not all that long ago, when it was announced that Facebook was hacked to the tune of 50 million accounts. The hack not only exposed user information but allowed the hackers access to what’s been referred to as ‘access tokens’, which theoretically would allow the hackers to gain access to other platforms which use Facebook as a login. While Facebook is now claiming the number of accounts hacked was closer to 30 million, it was believed the attack was carried out by state-sponsored agents. Now, Facebook is walking back on that claim and the new claim isn’t much better.

  According to yesterday’s report from the Wall Street Journal, brought here via Business Insider, an anonymous Facebook insider has said that the hack was conducted by your run of the mill spam hackers. These hackers are the type who are in it for the money rather than any political ideal. Among some of the information that was taken from Facebook were birthdates, phone numbers, search history of Facebook users.

  In my opinion, it’s worse that Facebook was hacked by a group of spam hackers rather than a foreign power. To me, this means that Facebook’s security is lacking in a basic way since they can’t keep out the hackers who sell your information to email spammers and phone scammers. An attack from a world power can almost be understood against a platform that is as massive as Facebook. However, Facebook’s security should be above nickel and dime attacks like this that are more akin to the stereotypical hacker who lives in their parents’ basement.

  A saying that’s been going around in tech circles lately is that the only safe Facebook account is a deleted Facebook account.

   

  Leave a ReplyCancel reply
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on October 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Google ( 29 ), privacy ( 46 ), security ( 46 )   

  Security breach claims Google+ 

  

  Stop me if you’ve heard this one. A major social network run by a major tech corporation exposes a good size chunk of its user data which the company chooses not to disclose until it’s investigated by the media. Normally, you probably wouldn’t be wrong if you thought that this was another story about Facebook but for once you’d be mistaken. This time it’s Google’s failed attempt at a social network known as Google Plus or Google+ as the search engine behemoth has branded it.

  The Wall Street Journal recently uncovered that a flaw in Google+ allowed user data to be exposed for 500,000 users. While this would be a drop in the bucket for Facebook, this is a massive breach for Google+ users. After the Journal report was released, Google almost immediately announced it was shuttering Google+ within the next ten months. So by August of 2019, Google+ will be no more. In a very Facebook-like move. Google reportedly knew of the breach back in Spring of this year but remained silent on it in order to avoid the controversy that Facebook was undergoing after the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

  Now, we can all joke about how barely anyone we know used Google+ but its impending demise shows a greater problem among the tech giants whose services we all use. Whether it’s Facebook, Google, Twitter or whomever, we use their services in exchange for a certain amount of trust that our personal information will be handled with a modicum of responsibility. Many of these companies have betrayed that trust especially in 2018. If these data breaches continue then these companies are just begging for governmental regulation and considering how divisive and partisan the current governmental scene is, it would make it the worst time for any kind of sweeping legislative change.

   
• 

  Geebo 10:15 am on October 1, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), security ( 46 )   

  Another day, another Facebook leak. 50m users this time. 

  

  It must be a day ending in Y because once again, a security breach in Facebook has exposed the user information of some 50 million accounts. It was reported this past Friday, that there was a flaw in Facebook security that potentially could have led hackers to have access to these millions of accounts. What makes matters worse with this latest Facebook security breach is that the information could have led to the hijacking of other accounts outside of Facebook.

  The information exposed is called an access token. Access tokens allow you to login to other services using your Facebook account. Facebook is so entrenched in our lives that our Facebook accounts now act as our logins to a multitude of other platforms including those not owned by Facebook. So potentially, not only could your Facebook account have been taken over but most of your online life could have been assumed if you’re that reliant on your Facebook login.

  Facebook has said they have fixed the problem but once again this is Facebook closing the barn door after the horses have already gotten out. The data breaches are becoming so prevalent that we’ve just accepted them as inevitable. Is this really the platform we want to be trusting with our personal information? We share so much on Facebook that even without access bad actors could determine so much about us that they could use to our advantage. With Facebook leaking our information on top of that it shows that we’ve clearly given up on security for convenience.

  Is Facebook falling apart at the seams? | Greg's Corner is discussing. Toggle Comments

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on July 23, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Crimson Hexagon, data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), privacy ( 46 ), surveillance ( 2 )   

  Facebook is facing yet another privacy problem 

  

  Once again Facebook finds itself embroiled in controversy over the possible abuse of user data. If you’ll recall, Facebook was admonished by both the US and UK governments when it was discovered that analytics firm Cambridge Analytica had improperly obtained the personal data of 87 million Facebook users. Now, Facebook has suspended a research firm from accessing its data over surveillance concerns.

  Over the weekend, Facebook suspended its contract with research and marketing firm Crimson Hexagon. This was in response to a Wall Street Journal article that claims Crimson Hexagon has contracts with entities that have ties to US and Russian government agencies. Facebook has suspended Crimson Hexagon’s access to user data over fears that the data is being used to conduct government surveillance on Facebook users. Crimson Hexagon denies this claim and says they only get their information from public Facebook posts. However, it is a bit disconcerting that Crimson Hexagon has over 1 trillion of these posts in their databases.

  Besides the fact that this may be another case of Facebook being unable to keep track of who has its data, there’s another concern here. Facebook is only reacting to these potential breaches only after its brought to their attention by the media. By the time Facebook becomes aware of the problem, the data is already in questionable hands. Is Facebook not properly vetting these data collectors, or does Facebook just not really care about our privacy as long as they’re being paid for our information? Then again, the Cambridge Analytica scandal didn’t seem to hurt Facebook so it’s unlikely this latest kerfuffle will either. What will it really take before the American public realizes that Facebook’s only interest is in itself?

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on July 11, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Cambridge Analytica ( 3 ), data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), privacy ( 46 )   

  Facebook facing fine from UK government 

  

  Yesterday, it was announced that the British government plans on fining Facebook for their role in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office claims Facebook failed to ensure another company had deleted users’ data. Because of this, the ICO is looking to fine Facebook the maximum amount allowed by British law. While that may sound impressive, the actual amount is paltry compared to Facebook’s net worth.

  The ICO is planning on levying a fine of £500,000 against the social media juggernaut. That equates to around $663,000 in US figures. If this fine is imposed it will no doubt have little to no impact on Facebook since the house that Mark built probably makes this amount in less than a minute. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg could probably pay this fine just from the change cup in his Acura.

  Fines probably mean nothing to Facebook. Even if they were to be fined $1 billion, they could recoup that loss in a matter of days. Facebook won’t enact any real change until governments start threatening to regulate. It doesn’t even have to be the US government as the EU famously got both Microsoft and Google to curtail some of their more questionable business practices. Until then, Facebook will shake off any fine like so many fleas from a dog.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:01 am on June 28, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), privacy ( 46 )   

  Facebook can’t keep track of where your data went 

  

  You’ll have to forgive us for constantly railing on Facebook for its sieve-like tendencies when it comes to its users’ personal data. I can’t speak for everyone at Geebo, but I come from a time on the internet when you didn’t share a bunch of personal information online. Then almost overnight with the advent of social media, we started sharing almost every intimate detail of our personal lives. Even if you post the most innocuous statuses on Facebook, the social media giant can determine so many things about you as this video demonstrates.

  According to a recent report from the Wall Street Journal, Facebook has so much of our data that they can’t keep track of it all. We’re all familiar with the Cambridge Analytica scandal by now but as the WSJ points out, Facebook has also given a lot of our data to companies that are no longer in business and because of that our personal information could be anywhere out in the wild. Once something is out on the internet it’s next to impossible to get it back.

  Again it needs to be said that this is too much information for one entity like Facebook to have. It’s now gotten to the point where Facebook apparently seems to be the proverbial submarine with a screen door when it comes to our personal data. This data can be abused in so many ways by bad actors and Facebook treats it like so much junk mail that it just throws on a table and forgets about it. Unfortunately, the only true way to stop Facebook from abusing our private data is to stop giving it to them, but in a society that’s driven by how many likes you can get for your vacation photos that won’t be happening any time soon.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:16 am on June 7, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), Huawei ( 2 ), privacy ( 46 )   

  Did Facebook share data with the Chinese government? 

  

  I’ve mentioned previously that I don’t normally feel inclined to post about the same subject in the same week. For example, if Facebook makes the news for one of its many alleged data leaks, I try to only post about that once a week. I do this to try to avoid reader burnout on any particular topic. However, Facebook seems to be the gift that keeps on giving with its reported mishandling of user data when it comes to third parties. Now, there are concerns that Facebook may have inadvertently shared user data with a foreign government.

  In an update to our previous post about Facebook sharing user data with device manufacturers, one of those manufacturers has questionable ties with the Chinese government. China-based Huawei is the third largest manufacturers of cell phones in the world. Many within the US government believe that Huawei could allow access to their devices by the government of China which could lead to espionage in the US. This is nothing new either as these concerns have been around since the last two previous administrations. Huawei is one of those manufacturers that Facebook had an agreement with to share user data leading some to assume that Facebook may have exposed user data to the government of China.

  Once again, Facebook is playing catch-up with their possible data breaches as they say that they’re ending their relationship with Huawei even though Huawei claims they never exposed any user information.

  How many more potential data breaches will it take before the public decides to limit the personal information they voluntarily give to Facebook who then gives it to multiple third parties? The US government already seems poised to regulate or break up Facebook, yet the Facebook users continue to sacrifice privacy for the sake of convenience.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:01 am on May 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), Freedom From Facebook, privacy ( 46 )   

  Advocacy group wants Facebook broken up 

  

  In today’s heated political climate, there are very few things that both conservatives and progressives can agree upon. One of those things that both sides believe is that Facebook wields more power than the social platform knows what to do with. For the right, it was the alleged election interference that made Facebook the enemy. For the left, it’s been the multiple data breaches and Facebook’s alleged disregard for user privacy that’s put them in their crosshairs. Now, a progressive-led coalition sees Facebook as a monopoly and is petitioning the Federal Trade Commission to break it up.

  According to Quartz, a coalition of progressive groups has banded together to form ‘Freedom From Facebook’. Their main goal is to have the FTC take four Facebook properties, Facebook, Messenger, Instagram, and WhatsApp, and break them into separate companies. While Facebook has shown that it wields such an ungodly amount of power that Facebook can’t control it all, does it really constitute a monopoly?

  The most infamous monopoly break-up was that of AT&T being broken up into the Baby Bells in the early 1980s. The main difference between the two companies is while Facebook appears to have a monopoly on social media and messaging, there are actual competitors to its ubiquitous platform. Prior to AT&T’s dissolution, you could not purchase a phone or phone service from any other company in the country. While they may not be as successful as Facebook, there are still successful competitors to each of the parts of Facebook. For social media, there is Twitter and Google Plus. For messaging there’s Kik and Wickr. Lastly, for photo sharing there is Snapchat. While none of these platforms come close to having the user numbers that Facebook does, they still do business and are somewhat successful at it.

  The problem with Facebook is that the public has willingly entered into a virtual monopoly as many continue to use Facebook exclusively, even in the face of all of Facebook’s scandals. To many, Facebook is today as the TV was to previous generations. It’s the platform most of us sit around in order to see what’s going on in the outside world and with such a wide adoption, it’s unlikely Facebook users will ‘tune out’ without more effective education about its drawbacks.

  NYT: Facebook sinks to new lows in trying to protect its rep | Greg's Corner is discussing. Toggle Comments

   
• 

  Geebo 9:00 am on May 15, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Cambridge, data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), mypersonality   

  Facebook exposes millions of users’ data…again 

  

  Stop me if you’ve heard this one. A personality quiz on Facebook compiled data from at least 6 million users and at least half of those users had their personal data exposed. Much like the Cambridge Analytica scandal, this data was freely available for four years before Facebook finally banned the app.

  New Scientist reports that an app called myPersonality was distributed by the University of Cambridge for an academic project. The problem was that the information collected was distributed to researchers on a website that was not very secure. It seems that a username and password for the website was could be found publicly by doing a web search. From there, anyone could steal the information which included the names of the quiz participants.

  Those in tech circles are known for calling on Facebook to tighten its security protocol, however, normal users of the platform really don’t have those concerns. In too many instances Facebook users are willing to sacrifice their own privacy for the sake of convenience, entertainment, or just plain boredom. While no major damage has been done from Facebook’s data breaches, it’s only a matter of time before so much data is lost that it causes the average Facebook user to stand up and take notice. If Facebook is not going to protect our data, maybe it’s time we stopped giving Facebook all of our information.

   
• 

  Geebo 9:02 am on April 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: CubeYou, data breach, Facebook ( 173 ), Mark Zuckerberg ( 7 ), Senator John Neely Kennedy   

  Senator to Facebook: “We Can Do It The Easy Way Or The Hard Way” 

  

  U.S. Senator John Neely Kennedy (R-La.)

  While we await further news on any prosecutorial action against Backpage, Facebook continues to dominate the headlines with more potential data breaches and a possible Congressional showdown.

  The first bit of news that made headlines over the weekend was that Facebook divulged another potentially damaging data breach that happened in a similar vein to that of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Facebook is said to have suspended operations with an analytical firm called CubeYou. CubeYou was accused of harvesting personal data from Facebook users through those quizzes that many people take on Facebook that appear on the surface to be innocuous. In this instance, CubeYou is accused of allegedly using the information collected to sell to marketers.

  How many more of these analytical firms are collecting Facebook user data against Facebook’s wishes? That’s what U.S. Senator John Kennedy would like to know. Yesterday Senator Kennedy, no relation to the famous Kennedy political family, appeared on Face the Nation and had a warning for Mark Zuckerberg. In the mostly friendly interview Senator Kennedy stated that he doesn’t want to regulate Facebook ‘half to death’, however, he also said that if Facebook is unwilling or incapable of fixing their problems, the Senator said “We can do this the easy way, or the hard way” in regard to Mark Zuckerberg’s expected appearance before Congress this week.

  Senator Kennedy seems like he has a good grasp on this situation at hand with Facebook. It appears that Senator Kennedy could either be Mark Zuckerberg’s best friend or worst enemy depending on how forthcoming the Facebook CEO will be with Congress this week.