Tagged: politics Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on September 23, 2026 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , politics,   

    The Political Scam Calls Are Coming 

    By Greg Collier

    Election season is coming, and scammers are getting ready.

    As November’s midterm elections approach, voters can expect political campaigns, candidates, advocacy groups, and political organizations to reach out in increasingly familiar ways. Unfortunately, scammers know that too.

    They can use the same phones, text messages, surveys, and donation requests to create convincing political scams designed to steal money or personal information.

    And now they have another weapon: artificial intelligence.

    Your “Campaign” Is Calling

    Imagine your phone rings.

    The caller says they represent a political campaign. Maybe they want your opinion in a survey. Maybe they say the campaign needs your support. Maybe they ask you to make a small donation before an important deadline.

    Everything sounds legitimate.

    Then the caller asks for your credit card number.

    Or your address.

    Or other personal information.

    Or they send you a link to make a donation.

    The problem is that the person on the other end may have nothing to do with the campaign they claim to represent.

    Warnings about political scam calls say fraudulent calls are taking several forms, including fake donation requests, bogus surveys, and AI-generated voice impersonations. One recent report cited estimates of roughly 21 million political scam calls during the summer, with scam call volume increasing sharply as the election approaches.

    The AI Voice on the Other End

    This is where the scam gets particularly unsettling.

    A scammer may not need to sound like a campaign representative.

    They may try to sound like the candidate.

    AI voice-cloning technology can make it possible to create a recording or live interaction that sounds like a real person. The FBI has separately warned about malicious campaigns using AI-generated voice messages to impersonate senior U.S. officials.

    That means hearing a familiar voice should no longer be treated as proof that the person calling you is actually who they claim to be.

    The voice could be convincing.

    The caller ID could look legitimate.

    The campaign name could be real.

    And the call could still be fraudulent.

    How the Political Scam Works

    The basic formula is surprisingly simple.

    First, the scammer chooses a political identity. They may claim to represent a candidate, campaign, political committee, or organization.

    Then comes the reason for the call. It might be a donation request, a political survey, or an urgent appeal tied to the upcoming election.

    Next comes the pressure. The caller may suggest that time is running out or that your contribution is urgently needed.

    Then comes the request for information or money. You may be asked for payment information, personal details, or access to an online account.

    Finally, the scammer disappears. The money goes somewhere it shouldn’t, or the information can potentially be used in additional fraud.

    The scammer doesn’t necessarily need you to donate thousands of dollars.

    A few dozen dollars from thousands of people can become a very profitable operation.

    Fake Surveys Can Be Dangerous Too

    Not every political scam begins with a request for money.

    Some begin with a survey.

    You receive a call asking what issues matter to you or which candidate you support. That might sound harmless.

    But a fake survey can be used as a way to collect personal information.

    The questions may gradually become more invasive. The caller could ask for your name, address, age, employment information, or other details.

    The information itself can have value to criminals.

    And because people are accustomed to being asked political questions during an election season, they may not recognize the interaction as suspicious.

    Don’t Rely on Caller ID

    One of the easiest mistakes to make is assuming the number on your screen proves who is calling.

    It doesn’t.

    The FTC warns that scammers can manipulate caller ID so a call appears to come from a local number or an organization you recognize.

    A call that appears to come from a campaign office could actually be coming from somewhere else entirely.

    The same warning applies to text messages and links.

    A message can use a legitimate campaign’s name or branding without actually coming from that campaign.

    Red Flags

    Be suspicious when an unsolicited political call demands an immediate donation.

    Be especially careful if the caller wants you to pay through cryptocurrency, a gift card, a wire transfer, or another difficult-to-reverse payment method. The FTC warns that scammers commonly push consumers toward these payment methods.

    Other warning signs include:

    • Pressure to donate immediately.
    • Requests for personal information that seem unrelated to the stated purpose of the call.
    • A caller who becomes aggressive when you say you want to verify the request.
    • Links sent by text that take you to an unfamiliar donation website.
    • A campaign or political organization with a name that sounds almost, but not exactly, like a real one.
    • A caller insisting that the phone number displayed on your caller ID proves who they are.
    • A request for payment through gift cards, cryptocurrency, or other unusual methods.
    • A voice that sounds exactly like a candidate but cannot be independently verified.

    Hang Up and Verify

    You don’t have to determine whether a political call is legitimate while you’re still on the phone with the caller.

    Hang up.

    Then find the campaign or organization’s official website independently.

    Use contact information you locate yourself rather than calling the number provided by the suspicious caller.

    If you decide to donate, navigate to the organization’s official website yourself instead of clicking an unexpected text message link.

    The FTC recommends researching organizations before donating and warns consumers not to rely on caller ID as proof of authenticity.

    Don’t Let Politics Lower Your Guard

    Political messages can trigger strong emotions.

    A scammer can take advantage of enthusiasm, anger, fear, or urgency without caring which side of an issue you support.

    That’s why these scams can work across the political spectrum.

    The scammer doesn’t necessarily need you to agree with a particular candidate.

    They just need you to care enough to act quickly.

    That could mean donating $20 because you’re excited about a campaign.

    It could mean answering a survey because you want your opinion heard.

    Or it could mean providing personal information because the caller sounds like someone you recognize.

    What About Legitimate Political Donations?

    A request for a political contribution is not automatically a scam.

    There are legitimate campaigns and political organizations that solicit donations by phone, text, email, and other methods.

    The key is verification.

    If you want to support a particular candidate or political organization, go directly to its official website and find the donation information yourself.

    Don’t assume that a link sent to your phone is genuine simply because it contains a familiar name or logo.

    And don’t let someone on the phone pressure you into making a contribution before you’ve had time to verify who is asking.

    The FBI specifically advises people to research individuals and entities before making political donations. It also warns about fraudulent political action committees, or “scam PACs,” that are designed to divert political contributions for personal financial gain.

    If You Already Gave the Scammers Money

    If you believe you donated to a fraudulent organization, save everything.

    Keep the phone number, text messages, emails, website address, receipts, and payment records.

    Contact your bank or credit card company as soon as possible if you provided payment information or believe a fraudulent charge occurred.

    You can also report suspected fraud to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. The FBI also accepts reports involving suspected federal election crimes through its reporting channels.

    If the scam involved a fake campaign or political committee, preserve the name and website. Those details can help investigators identify patterns.

    Final Thoughts

    Election season gives scammers something incredibly valuable: millions of people who are paying attention.

    They can exploit that attention with fake surveys, fake campaign representatives, fake donation requests, and increasingly convincing AI-generated voices.

    The technology may change, but the basic scam remains the same.

    Someone wants you to trust them quickly.

    Someone wants your information or your money.

    And someone hopes you won’t stop long enough to verify the story.

    So when the political call comes, remember this:

    A familiar voice doesn’t prove who’s calling. A familiar name doesn’t prove who’s asking. And caller ID doesn’t prove anything.

    Before you donate, answer questions, or provide personal information, hang up and verify.

    During election season, taking a few extra minutes could keep your money and your information out of a scammer’s hands.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:00 am on October 22, 2025 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , politics, , ,   

    Deepfake Donors: When Political Voices Are Fake 

    Deepfake Donors: When Political Voices Are Fake

    By Greg Collier

    You get a text from your “preferred political candidate.” It asks for a small donation of ten dollars “to fight misinformation” or “protect election integrity.” The link looks official. The voice message attached even sounds authentically passionate, familiar, and persuasive.

    But it isn’t real. And neither is the person behind it.

    This fall, investigators from the U.S. Treasury and U.K. authorities announced their largest-ever takedown of cybercriminal networks responsible for billions in losses tied to fraudulent campaigns, fake fundraising, and AI-generated political deepfakes. This operation struck transnational organized criminal groups based especially in Southeast Asia, including the notorious Prince Group TCO, a dominant cybercrime player in Cambodia’s scam economy responsible for billions in illicit financial transactions. U.S. losses alone to online investment scams topped $16.6 billion, with over $10 billion lost to scam operations based in Southeast Asia just last year.​

    These scams are blurring the line between digital activism and manipulation right when citizens are most vulnerable: election season.

    What’s Going On:

    Scammers are exploiting voters’ trust in political communication, blending voice cloning, AI video, and fraudulent donation sites to extract money and personal data.​

    Here’s how it works:

    • A deepfake video or voicemail mimics a real candidate, complete with campaign slogans and “urgent” donation requests.
    • The links lead to fraudulent websites where victims enter credit card details.
    • Some schemes even collect personal voter data later sold or used for identity theft.

    In 2024’s New Hampshire primaries, voice-cloned robocalls impersonating national figures were caught attempting to sway voters, a precursor to the tactics now being scaled globally in 2025.​

    Why It’s Effective:

    These scams thrive because people trust familiarity, especially voices, faces, and causes they care about. The timing, emotional tone, and recognizable slogans create a powerful illusion of legitimacy.

    Modern AI makes it nearly impossible for the average person to distinguish a deepfake from reality, especially when wrapped in high-stakes messaging about public service, patriotism, or “protecting democracy.” Add in social pressure, and even cautious donors lower their guard.

    Red Flags:

    Before contributing or sharing campaign links, pause and check for these telltale signs:

    • Donation requests that come through texts, WhatsApp, or unknown numbers.
    • Voices or videos that sound slightly “off,” mismatched mouth movements, odd pauses, or inconsistent lighting.
    • Links that end in unusual extensions (like “.co” or “.support”) rather than official candidate domains.
    • Payment requests through Venmo, CashApp, Zelle, or crypto.
    • No clear disclosure or FEC registration details at the bottom of the website.

    Quick tip: Official campaigns in the U.S. are required to display Federal Election Commission (FEC) registration and disclaimers. If that’s missing, it’s a huge red flag.

    What You Can Do:

    • Verify before donating. Go directly to the official campaign site; don’t use links from texts or emails.
    • Treat urgency as a warning. Real campaigns rarely need “immediate wire transfers.”
    • Listen for tells. Deepfakes often have slightly distorted sounds or mechanical echoes.
    • Cross-check messages. If you get a surprising call or voicemail, compare it with the candidate’s latest verified posts.
    • Report and share. Submit suspicious calls or videos to reportfraud.ftc.gov or your state election board.

    Platforms including Google, Meta, and YouTube are now launching active detection systems and educational tools to flag deepfake political content before it spreads.​

    If You’ve Been Targeted:

    • Report donations made to fake campaigns immediately to your bank or credit card provider.
    • File a complaint through the FTC and local election authorities.
    • Freeze credit if personal or voter identity data were shared.
    • Publicize responsibly. Sharing examples with the right context can warn others, but avoid amplifying active scams.

    Final Thoughts:

    Deepfakes are no longer a distant concern; they’re reshaping political communication in real time. What makes this wave dangerous isn’t just money loss; it’s trust erosion.

    The recent takedown of the Prince Group’s transnational criminal networks by U.S. and U.K. authorities, which included sanctions on key individuals and cutting off millions in illicit financial flows, underscores the global scale of this problem. Their coordinated actions disrupted the infrastructure enabling these massive fraud campaigns, providing a much-needed deterrent to criminals using AI-based scams during critical democratic processes.​

    Staying safe now means applying the same critical awareness you’d use for phishing to the content you see and hear. Don’t assume your eyes or ears tell the full story.

    Think you spotted a fake campaign video or suspicious fundraising call? Don’t scroll past it; report it, discuss it, and share this guide. The more people who know what to look for, the fewer fall for it.

    Further Reading:

     
  • Greg Collier 9:11 am on October 31, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , politics, VICE News   

    Has Facebook made any progress in stopping election meddling? 

    Has Facebook made any progress in stopping election meddling?

    Ever since the 2016 Presidential campaign, Facebook has been under fire for allegedly allowing foreign influencers to post deceptive ads designed to agitate the political scene in America. Since then Facebook has made claims that they’ve made strides in verifying who has paid for political ads and have removed several accounts thought to belong to Russian and Iranian groups looking to further interfere in the democratic process. So with the midterm elections less than a week away, Facebook must be all good right? Well, as you can probably expect, not so much.

    VICE News recently published an expose on just how well Facebook is screening their political ads. VICE paid for 100 political ads on Facebook posing as all sitting US Senators. All 100 ads were approved by Facebook showing that just about anybody with the time and money can allegedly pay for any ad they want posing as whoever they want. Building off of VICE’s idea, Business Insider took another tact by buying an ad posing as Cambridge Analytica, the embattled firm that allegedly exposed millions of Facebook users’ information. Again, the ad was approved by Facebook with no problem.

    This is just further proof that no one should have their political views influenced by what they see or read on Facebook. Between your hyper-partisan friends who post meme after meme that reinforces their position no matter how wrong they might be, and the fact that just about anyone can buy an ad on Facebook posing as anyone and saying anything, Facebook has lost the fight to be considered a useful tool in political discourse. Anymore, Facebook just exhibits that it’s become the public restroom wall of the nation covered in the graffiti of misinformation.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:10 am on August 15, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , politics, ,   

    Study identifies who is really harming democracy on Facebook 

    Study identifies who is really harming democracy on Facebook

    By now, we should all be familiar with the stories about how Facebook was allegedly used by foreign influencers and bad actors to try to sway the 2016 Presidential Election. This has been an ongoing issue even up to the recent 2018 Primary Elections. Many in positions of power have called upon Facebook to try to clamp down on this problem, but what if I told you that it wasn’t Russia that was the biggest threat to democracy on Facebook, but rather it was us?

    According to a recent study by the University of Wisconsin–Madison, social media users are less informed about politics than those who refrain from social media. The study contributes this to most social users only skimming their social media feeds rather than taking the time to process or even further pursue the veracity of the information.

    It also doesn’t help that social media is where people go to feel safe in their bubbles of convenience where they would rather regurgitate whatever latest meme fits into their political party loyalty or narrow worldview. If you think I’m singling out one side of the political spectrum over the other, I’m not as both sides of the aisle are guilty of this behavior. So while the typical Facebook user may think he or she is the political scholar in their circle of friends, the odds are they really aren’t and as long as people keep acting and thinking like this democracy will remain threatened from within.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:59 am on November 21, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , politics, , Sandy Parakilas   

    Former Facebook Exec: Facebook can’t be trusted 

    Former Facebook Exec: Facebook can't be trusted

    In the wake of governmental calls for potential regulation against Facebook, one former Facebook employee has come out to say that Facebook must be regulated since they won’t regulate themselves. Former operations manager Sandy Parakilas wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times where he calls for the government to regulate Facebook since Facebook cares more about putting a stop to bad PR than they do about privacy.

    In his piece, Parakilas relates a story from before Facebook’s IPO where a game developer was using Facebook’s user information to automatically generate profiles of children without their consent. When the developer was confronted they claimed that no violation of Facebook policy took place and that there was no way to verify if this was true or not.

    Mr. Parakilas also calls out the fact that Facebook discovered Russian tampering on their platform after payments for ads were received in foreign currency. He says that much like his own investigation into the game developer, this should have been an easy thing to stop and he calls on the government to regulate Facebook as democracy itself is at stake with the amount of power Facebook yields.

    Facebook has almost become a world power in itself with the amount of information it possess and its infiltration into our lives. Without regulation it will just become a political tool for hire, being used by any entity who has the money to buy whatever influence they want.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:57 am on November 3, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Colin Stretch, , , , politics, ,   

    Are cowardly CEOs afraid to face Congress over Russia probe? 

    Are cowardly CEOs afraid to face Congress over Russia probe?

    Not pictured: Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, and Larry Page

    This week, Congress continued its probe into alleged Russian influencers purchasing ads on the internet’s three top platforms, Facebook, Google and Twitter. Rather than appearing themselves, the CEOs of each company sent their legal counsel in their stead. Yes, that’s not unheard of for businesses to send their legal representatives to Congress, but we’re talking about these companies taking money from foreign entities that might have influenced the outcome of the 2016 election.

    While Congress by and large can be tech-illiterate, at least one Senator seemed to hammer the point home that these companies probably knew who they were taking money from. Minnesota Senator Al Franken showed everyone just how unwilling these companies are to divulge the truth.

    Senator Franken put forth a poignant argument to Facebook’s legal Counsel, Colin Stretch…

    “People are buying ads on your platform with roubles. They’re political ads. You put billions of data points together all the time. That’s what I hear that these platforms do: they’re the most sophisticated things invented by man, ever. Google has all knowledge that man has ever developed. You can’t put together roubles with a political ad and go hmm, those two data points spell out something bad?”

    Stretch replied: “Senator, it’s a signal we should have been alert to and in hindsight–”

    But Franken cut him off, asking whether Facebook would pledge not to publish a political ad paid for in North Korean won. As Stretch demurred, Franken interjected fiercely: “Please answer yes or no, sir. You’re sophisticated. You’re the chief legal counsel for Facebook. Please answer yes or no.”

    Of course, Senator Franken did not get a straight answer out of Stretch. Instead the counselor hemmed and hawed his way through a non-committal answer.

    However, the question remains, why weren’t the CEOs there to answer questions directly? What exactly are they afraid of? Perjury perhaps? Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg didn’t comment on the hearings until the day after Stretch’s testimony on an earnings call.

    “I’m dead serious,” Zuckerberg said. “I’ve directed our team to invest so much in security on top of the other investments we’re making it will significantly impact our profitability going forward.” That investment will include hiring at least 10,000 new employees to focus on security and enforcement. CFO David Wehner later clarified that many of those new jobs won’t be full time but rather contract positions at partner companies.

    “Protecting our community is more important than maximizing our profits,” Zuckerberg said.

    Which doesn’t address the problem at hand at all. Zuckerberg was then said to have handed off the remainder of the call to Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg.

    Facebook was the biggest offender in this story having served up alleged Russian ads to at least 125 million American users. Considering the entire population of the US is 323 million, that’s not a small percentage of potential voters who saw these misleading ads. That’s more than enough people to sway an election one way or the other. If protecting the community is more important than profits, why take the foreign money at all for American political ads? Facebook can claim hindsight is 20/20 all they want, but there were accusations of Russian political meddling even before these ads appeared on Facebook. So how could accepting Russian currency for American political ads not throw up a red flag?

    If you don’t think the CEOs of this company aren’t cowards, please think of this for a moment. Even Backpage CEO Carl Ferrer eventually appeared before Congress. So when the CEO of a company that reportedly makes money from the sexual slave trade in this country appears before Congress and these other CEOs don’t, it goes a long way in showing just how scared of Congress they probably are.

     
  • Greg Collier 8:26 am on October 27, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Crowds on Demand, , politics   

    Is craigslist a breeding ground for political agitation? 

    Is craigslist a breeding ground for political agitation?

    Not too long ago, Facebook made headlines when it was revealed they had accepted ad revenue from Russian interests who were allegedly trying to disrupt the 2016 Presidential Election. Facebook was even called before Congress and provided the government with the information they had about the Russian group. It was nothing less than a public shaming for Facebook, yet there’s a website that has long been used for political chicanery in this country by its own citizens and no official ever bats an eye at it. Of course we’re talking about craigslist.

    Both major political parties in this country have accused the other of using paid protesters or paid supporters at many rallies and events. Many of these ads are posted in the jobs sections which means craigslist is accepting ad revenue for these ads. While there have been hoax ads and ads for paid political activism such as canvassing there is still evidence to show that craigslist is being used by political groups to undermine the truth.

    For example, take this ad that was posted on craigslist in Charlotte, North Carolina, offering $25 for actors and photographers.

    While the company who posted the ad, Crowds on Demand, did not specifically ask for protesters they did mention that they are in the business of hiring people to take place in protests. Even their website has a section for protests and rallies where they pride themselves in organizing a paid crowd to show up for almost any kind of protest. The internet being what it is, I thought Crowds on Demand could be an elaborate prank, but according to NPR they are in fact a real business entity.

    Even the hoax ads that call for protesters can be disruptive as they often make the local news of where they’ve been posted. With politics being at a divisive high in our country right now, this usually leads to both sides of the political spectrum accusing each other of trying to fool the public.

    While all of this is happening, craigslist just continues to accept the revenue for these ads, be they hoax or not, without doing so much as a basic check to see if these employment offers are legitimate, and they’re never investigated for fostering such inflammatory material for money. Again, craigslist will try to tell you they’re a socially conscious company when in reality they’re anything but.

     
  • Greg Collier 9:01 am on May 9, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , politics,   

    Facebook turns to old media to fight fake news prior to UK election 

    Facebook turns to old media to fight fake news prior to UK election

    In the run up to Election Day in the UK, Facebook has turned to an unlikely ally in their continuing struggle against ‘fake news’. The social network behemoth has taken out several print ads in UK newspapers on how to recognize fake news.

    While the ads do contain helpful information on how to be a more discerning news consumer, it does indicate something Facebook probably won’t admit to itself. Facebook may feel some responsibility for the fake news that many think unduly affected the 2016 US Presidential Election. Thousands of dummy Facebook accounts have also been purged in anticipation of the election.

    However, the problem with the fake news argument is certain individuals have such a confirmation bias that they can’t be turned into more responsible content consumers. Take vaccinations for example. It was once claimed vaccinations caused autism, which caused many parents to forgo immunizations for their children. Even though that claim has been discredited many times over, there are still many people who cling to that fallacy.

    For many people, politics are their vaccinations. They blindly follow whatever dogma their chosen political party subscribes to no matter who the candidate may be. With those political leanings, many of these people will only read news from sources biased towards their own affiliation. It’s too late for Facebook users like that, they are lost to us.

    The only way to combat this kind of ignorance is for those of us who can discern fake news from fact to become more active in political matters and to get out and actually vote.

     
  • Greg Collier 10:58 am on February 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , politics   

    Is a politics free Facebook worth it? 

    Is a politics free Facebook worth it?

    Ever since the start of 2016 presidential campaign, which feels like it started in 1988, it seems like Facebook has been a never-ending series of political memes and rants. Maybe you long for the days for when Facebook was nothing but pictures of cats, what people had for dinner, and baby pictures? Well, today is your lucky day.

    Fox News recently posted an article that shows you several different options on how you can sanitize your Facebook feed from politics.

    From following, but not unfriending, friends, to browser extensions, you have several different options to turn your Facebook back to the days before alternative facts and deleted emails. The question is though, should you?

    If you eliminate all the politics from your Facebook you could be just enforcing your own confirmation bias. While you may find political opinions different from your own distasteful, to turn off those opinions outright is akin to sticking your head in the proverbial sand. No matter how right or wrong some of the Facebook political rants are they do expose you to the lives of others whose experiences are different from your own. So maybe in the midst of those rants you can find a kernel of thought-provoking information.

     
  • Greg Collier 10:56 am on December 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , politics   

    Fake news is a problem, but is it Facebook’s problem? 

    Fake news is a problem, bus is it Facebook's problem?

    A lot has been made about Facebook and its problem with fake news articles appearing on its social network. We even started discussing this back in August. Ever since Facebook eliminated its human curation staff the site seems to have flooded over night with fake or misleading headlines.

    In a blog post on Quartz, they discuss a study that shows that a majority of traffic to these fake, or what they call hyperpartisan news sites, comes from Facebook. As you may have surmised, hyperpartisan news sites are specifically designed to garner traffic from members of whatever political party they tend to represent For example, a site called ‘Occupy Democrats’ gets almost 80% of traffic from Facebook alone while the New York times only gets 11%.

    While Facebook’s former curation team would have prevented stories like this from ending up in their trending topics, it’s ultimately up to the Facebook user who shares and spreads this disinformation or hyperbole. Again, there are too many people on Facebook and the internet in general, who are too eager to share articles that reinforce their confirmation bias no matter how outlandish the premise of the story may be.

    While Facebook’s fake news quandary is indeed a problem, ultimately it’s not really Facebook’s problem. As a wise man once said “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel